I watched a couple of videos explaining the difference between being a big fish in a little pond and being a little fish in a big pond. And I thought I would attempt to deconstruct my thoughts on the matter via writing about it. This is what I came up with.
1. Ponds are relative.
At high school, I thought that that was a big pond. There were around 50 of us in the year; most extremely talented, driven and academically successful. One can sort of predict this cause to gain entry, you have to fill in an application, take an entrance exam and participate in a 3 night evaluation camp. Competition was fierce for a 12 year old, but I didn't know any better. Upon taking the first test in Form 1, I was ranked at number 35 in the year. Problem was, I never was a double digit for anything. So one might guess that I was under enthused. So I pulled up my bootstraps, put my head down and worked; resulting in finishing top three every year after. So as fishes go, I thought of myself as one of the bigger ones in this small-ish big pond. Academically at least. I was never great at sports and my social skills lacked big time; so academic excellence was so ingrained into my identity. This subsequently carried on to college.
But then university happened. Medical school happened.
My pond got a lot vaster, the water was choppy and fishes were huge left, right and centre. I met award-winning researchers and student leaders from elite British boarding schools; all extremely bright thinkers. Now, drowning against the current feels like a norm and one's instinct is to keep up because one feels so behind. Like kayaking against a strong current or more literally in my case, against rowers from Oxford and Cambridge. At this point, one's instinct is solely to survive. Everyday, I felt minuscule, inadequate and not smart. Quite gradually, I lost a large chunk of my identity. My ego was severely battered and bruised, not by anyone else, but through my own doing - as a result of constantly comparing myself to my peers. After many months of intermittent thoughts of "what am I doing here?", I acted. I coped with it like before; by pulling up my bootstraps, putting my head down and worked. But as circumstances (ie. the pond) have changed, now, my aims were quite different. Which brings me to my second point.
2. Bigger ponds come with lower expectations of oneself.
At this point, the days of chasing glory are over. Now its just about not getting left behind. Praying that you are at least not in the bottom 10% with every page revised. Greatness is no longer a goal, I just wanted to be good enough. However, what I learnt through this process is quite enlightening. Fear, and in this case, fear of failing, is one good motivator. One might not aim for glory, but that doesn't mean that the fear of fire does not lead one to the sun. Practically speaking, I didn't aim for anything except passing, but with the grace of God, I somehow (and surprisingly so) picked up a few academic prizes along the way. Every time that email with results come, I am sure that an administrator have messed them up. Because looking around, I always feel inadequate to deserve any such praise. But I guess inadequacy goes both ways. Unless you are a crowned genius, if you're in a big pond, chances are you will feel inadequate most of the time.
Inadequacy becomes one's new norm. One's new identity.
3. Big ponds are worth it.
I think the bottom line is: big ponds give you hope. If you can look at this situation positively that is, cause big ponds can be the source of hopelessness too. But to me, big ponds are a great blessing. Because here, I am surrounded by awe inspiring people. Here, noble prize winners are lecturers, award-winning professors are tutors and history-making clinicians are mentors. Just the mere proximity to them transmit flickers of hope that I could possibly be them one day. I could literally, follow in their footsteps in hospital and observe how they work. I could have conversations with them about the future of medicine or science's next frontier. This not only happens in the scientific world as London in itself is a hub where prominent religious scholars congregate to spread knowledge. I can just stand still and take it all in my osmosis, and I would feel like I am progressing.
In a nutshell: yes, big ponds will shatter one's ego. After a month, it will be as abstract as a modern art painting. But in return it gives glimmers of hope. Hope that one day, you could be a bigger fish than when you came. Cause really what is the point of being a big fish in a small pond if that is the limit of what you will become? Big ponds keep you on your feet, make you progress, make you better. And that push really, makes it all worth it.
________________
Sidenote:
Done with ponds? Try the ocean next.
(credit this ocean idea to husband, Akmal Khadir)
Tuesday, 27 October 2015