It just dawned on me that half of my iBSc year has come and gone in lightning speed. Yesterday I went to my friend's birthday party, and it was there I met up with many of my medic acquaintances whom I have seldom bumped into since our academic roads diverged. I was met with this question many times, "How is it going so far, your course?"
Honestly, I cannot rave about it enough. Maybe I am the type that truly belongs in the humanities so my views mights be quite skewed, but I do feel like I won the lottery with the choice of my course. I am loving it - and I hope to take what I have learnt this year onwards into my future career (whatever that may be). If I were to sum up 5 points that I have learnt so far, it would be these:
1. You can have an opinion
Most medical students struggle with this when we enter this course because throughout our education, we, or at least I was taught to take the middle road. To not lean towards one view or one school of thought. But in philosophy, you are taught to have a stand (or backbone) and fight for your point of view. Fight, with evidence so convincing, that you'll win over supporters (namely the people reading your essay). This was clearly very new to me - because after so long passively absorbing, for once I am required to actually think!
2. History is not fact
In the first week of the course, we had an introductory lecture with brief explanations of what is to come. One of the lecturers, Dr Reeves said something that I will remember forever. "History is not fact. History is what you interpret it to be." My initial reaction, with widened round eyes (if you have seen my small eyes, you would know how much an effort this is) was: WHAT? MY WHOLE LIFE WAS A LIE! In Malaysia, we were taught to memorise history. No negotiations, no reinterpretations, no discussion. When I learnt about how the state kings use to give up land to the British, I have always questioned how it could have been as easy as it was stated in the text books. No fighting, just "Here, my land is yours now." Proper strange - but I couldn't question what was in the text book because it was fact. So when Dr Reeves said what she said, it blew my mind! I never saw a historical book the same from then on out. I would read it from the eyes of the author, and question the "facts" in them which might be skewed to fulfil the author's personal agendas.
There you go, the truth is out kids! History is not fact. Which brings me to the next lesson...
3. Scientific facts are not facts (or truths)
Akin to the historians, scientists have their own agendas too. In weeks of classes, I have learnt about the philosophical arguments revolving around "scientific truth", the "objectivity" in scientific data and it has been utterly fascinating. In medical school, we were fed bundles of information and we were instructed to believe in them as verified truths without questioning its authenticity. But through philosophy, I am learning about the centuries of debates that has revolved around the "right" scientific method, the amount of trust that we give to our senses and the successful trajectory of science throughout history. For instance, I wrote a 3000 word essay defending a German philosopher, van Fraassen as to me, his thoughts upholds intellectual humility which scientific practice is seriously lacking nowadays. To van Fraassen, the word "truth" should only be used on things that we can observe, while unobservables should be suspended to only being "empirically adequate". Basically, if you see it, believe it - because if you cannot see it, it might turn out to be false. So if we subscribe to van Fraassen's philosophy, we should prevent ourselves from labelling things we cannot see like electrons, atoms, radio waves as un-refutable truths, because a new theory might come along and blow everything out of the water. Don't believe me? Einstein's relativity theory threw Newtonian mechanics into a complete frenzy. And history has its ways of repeating itself.
4. Freedom is liberating and paralysing at the same time
In all of my modules, I have essays to write. And in all of them, with an exception of one this term, I was allowed to choose the essay topic. I have never been given that sort of trust or freedom before, so it felt paralysing. "Write what interests you," they said. So for my first essay, I read so many articles and books, aimlessly looking for something that interests me. When I found one that might be "the one", I abandoned it the next day for something that interested me more. It took so much time for me to commit to one topic, but when I did, I thrived. Enjoying what you are researching really makes a difference. So instead of pretending to be interested in Leonardo da Vinci, I can creatively commit to exploring the world of Salvador Dali instead.
As the saying goes, "Love what you do. Do what you love."
5. Thing(s) I know for sure
It suffices to say that I have grown a lot more skeptical as the years draws closer to a close. It really cannot be helped. I have realised that we are living in a human constructed world. Science, art, reason, logic and indeed philosophy are all created and developed by humans. And as fragile a person is, so too are their creations. Full of mistakes, fallible at every corner and incoherent. So, it got me thinking: what is it that I know for sure? It was this: I am going to die. Sounds very morose, but it is a fact. Life is unpredictable, but death is certain. So why do people prepare for life but neglect to prepare for death?
In short, through my short philosophy deep dive, I have discovered that historically, people have been thirsty for one thing: truth. Philosophy's mistake is putting man (and his thoughts, his theories etc) at the centre of the study.
If only they centred their intellectual discourses to a place where imperfection was completely absent, I would argue that they would in the end find the truth that they dedicated their lives searching for.
So I guess another thing I know for sure is: God is perfect, and therein lies the truth we all seek.